Currently only a single field in the representor private structure
is relevant for uplink representors. As a pre-step to allow adding
additional uplink representor fields, introduce uplink representor
private structure.
This is prepration step towards replacing egdev logic with the
indirect block notification mechanism. This patch doesn't change
any functionality.
Signed-off-by: Oz Shlomo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eli Britstein <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Or Gerlitz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <[email protected]>
{
struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = mlx5e_rep_to_rep_priv(rep);
struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(rpriv->netdev);
-
+ struct mlx5_rep_uplink_priv *uplink_priv = &rpriv->uplink_priv;
int err;
if (test_bit(MLX5E_STATE_OPENED, &priv->state)) {
goto err_remove_sqs;
/* init shared tc flow table */
- err = mlx5e_tc_esw_init(&rpriv->tc_ht);
+ err = mlx5e_tc_esw_init(&uplink_priv->tc_ht);
if (err)
goto err_neigh_cleanup;
mlx5e_remove_sqs_fwd_rules(priv);
/* clean uplink offloaded TC rules, delete shared tc flow table */
- mlx5e_tc_esw_cleanup(&rpriv->tc_ht);
+ mlx5e_tc_esw_cleanup(&rpriv->uplink_priv.tc_ht);
mlx5e_rep_neigh_cleanup(rpriv);
}
unsigned long min_interval; /* jiffies */
};
+struct mlx5_rep_uplink_priv {
+ /* Filters DB - instantiated by the uplink representor and shared by
+ * the uplink's VFs
+ */
+ struct rhashtable tc_ht;
+};
+
struct mlx5e_rep_priv {
struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep;
struct mlx5e_neigh_update_table neigh_update;
struct net_device *netdev;
struct mlx5_flow_handle *vport_rx_rule;
struct list_head vport_sqs_list;
- struct rhashtable tc_ht; /* valid for uplink rep */
+ struct mlx5_rep_uplink_priv uplink_priv; /* valid for uplink rep */
};
static inline
if (MLX5_VPORT_MANAGER(priv->mdev) && esw->mode == SRIOV_OFFLOADS) {
uplink_rpriv = mlx5_eswitch_get_uplink_priv(esw, REP_ETH);
- return &uplink_rpriv->tc_ht;
+ return &uplink_rpriv->uplink_priv.tc_ht;
} else
return &priv->fs.tc.ht;
}