The davinci_gpio_register() function expects the number of
resources as the second parameter, but sizeof() resources
was passed to it due to which it was causing unexpected
behaviour. This patch fixes the same by passing the
ARRAY_SIZE() of resources.
Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <[email protected]>
int __init dm355_gpio_register(void)
{
return davinci_gpio_register(dm355_gpio_resources,
- sizeof(dm355_gpio_resources),
+ ARRAY_SIZE(dm355_gpio_resources),
&dm355_gpio_platform_data);
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
int __init dm365_gpio_register(void)
{
return davinci_gpio_register(dm365_gpio_resources,
- sizeof(dm365_gpio_resources),
+ ARRAY_SIZE(dm365_gpio_resources),
&dm365_gpio_platform_data);
}
int __init dm644x_gpio_register(void)
{
return davinci_gpio_register(dm644_gpio_resources,
- sizeof(dm644_gpio_resources),
+ ARRAY_SIZE(dm644_gpio_resources),
&dm644_gpio_platform_data);
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
int __init dm646x_gpio_register(void)
{
return davinci_gpio_register(dm646x_gpio_resources,
- sizeof(dm646x_gpio_resources),
+ ARRAY_SIZE(dm646x_gpio_resources),
&dm646x_gpio_platform_data);
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/