In the lpfc discovery engine, when as a nvme target, where the driver
was performing mailbox io with the adapter for port login when a NVME
PRLI is received from the host. Rather than queue and eventually get
back to sending a response after the mailbox traffic, the driver
rejected the io with an error response.
Turns out this particular initiator didn't like the rejection values
(unable to process command/command in progress) so it never attempted a
retry of the PRLI. Thus the host never established nvme connectivity
with the lpfc target.
By changing the rejection values (to Logical Busy/nothing more), the
initiator accepted the response and would retry the PRLI, resulting in
nvme connectivity.
Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>
* rpi registration does complete.
*/
memset(&stat, 0, sizeof(struct ls_rjt));
- stat.un.b.lsRjtRsnCode = LSRJT_UNABLE_TPC;
- stat.un.b.lsRjtRsnCodeExp = LSEXP_CMD_IN_PROGRESS;
+ stat.un.b.lsRjtRsnCode = LSRJT_LOGICAL_BSY;
+ stat.un.b.lsRjtRsnCodeExp = LSEXP_NOTHING_MORE;
lpfc_els_rsp_reject(vport, stat.un.lsRjtError, cmdiocb,
ndlp, NULL);
return ndlp->nlp_state;