Code of Conflict
authorGreg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:44:24 +0000 (11:44 -0800)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:44:24 +0000 (11:44 -0800)
This file provides a basic guide for how to handle conflict resolution
when it comes up in the development process.

Acked-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Chris Ball <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Herrmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johan Hedberg <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Acked-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Magnus Damm <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sachin Prabhu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Zefan Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Documentation/CodeOfConflict [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/Documentation/CodeOfConflict b/Documentation/CodeOfConflict
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1684d0b
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+Code of Conflict
+----------------
+
+The Linux kernel development effort is a very personal process compared
+to "traditional" ways of developing software.  Your code and ideas
+behind it will be carefully reviewed, often resulting in critique and
+criticism.  The review will almost always require improvements to the
+code before it can be included in the kernel.  Know that this happens
+because everyone involved wants to see the best possible solution for
+the overall success of Linux.  This development process has been proven
+to create the most robust operating system kernel ever, and we do not
+want to do anything to cause the quality of submission and eventual
+result to ever decrease.
+
+If however, anyone feels personally abused, threatened, or otherwise
+uncomfortable due to this process, that is not acceptable.  If so,
+please contact the Linux Foundation's Technical Advisory Board at
+<[email protected]>, or the individual members, and they
+will work to resolve the issue to the best of their ability.  For more
+information on who is on the Technical Advisory Board and what their
+role is, please see:
+       http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/advisory-councils/tab
+
+As a reviewer of code, please strive to keep things civil and focused on
+the technical issues involved.  We are all humans, and frustrations can
+be high on both sides of the process.  Try to keep in mind the immortal
+words of Bill and Ted, "Be excellent to each other."