Use the new snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single() helper function rather than
installing a list constraint with a single value. Since
snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single() sets a static constraint while
snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list() sets a dynamic constraint the former is
slightly more efficient and it also needs less code.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
return 0;
}
-static unsigned int rates_48000[] = {
- 48000,
-};
-
-static struct snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list constraints_48000 = {
- .count = ARRAY_SIZE(rates_48000),
- .list = rates_48000,
-};
-
static int cht_aif1_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
- return snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list(substream->runtime, 0,
- SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE,
- &constraints_48000);
+ return snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single(substream->runtime,
+ SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE, 48000);
}
static struct snd_soc_ops cht_aif1_ops = {