x86/io: Make readq() / writeq() API consistent
authorAndy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:09:34 +0000 (20:09 +0300)
committerIngo Molnar <[email protected]>
Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:18:21 +0000 (11:18 +0200)
Despite the following commit:

  93093d099e5d ("x86: provide readq()/writeq() on 32-bit too, complete")

which says:

  ...Also, map all the APIs to the strongest ordering variant. It's way
  too easy to mess such details up in drivers and the difference between
  "memory" and "" constrained asm() constructs is in the noise range.

... we have for now only one user of this API (i.e. writeq_relaxed() in
drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/sth.c) on x86 and it does care about
"relaxed" part of it.

Moreover 32-bit support has been removed from that header, though appeared
later in specific headers that emphasizes its non-atomic context.

The rest should keep in mind a consistent picture of the __raw_IO() vs. IO()
vs. IO_relaxed() API.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
arch/x86/include/asm/io.h

index b3bba2f87e18256befbdc701826dbf97c52fad47..9ada93f01524d797088995fcd6538886e7e301c0 100644 (file)
@@ -94,13 +94,15 @@ build_mmio_write(__writel, "l", unsigned int, "r", )
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 
 build_mmio_read(readq, "q", unsigned long, "=r", :"memory")
+build_mmio_read(__readq, "q", unsigned long, "=r", )
 build_mmio_write(writeq, "q", unsigned long, "r", :"memory")
+build_mmio_write(__writeq, "q", unsigned long, "r", )
 
-#define readq_relaxed(a)       readq(a)
-#define writeq_relaxed(v, a)   writeq(v, a)
+#define readq_relaxed(a)       __readq(a)
+#define writeq_relaxed(v, a)   __writeq(v, a)
 
-#define __raw_readq(a)         readq(a)
-#define __raw_writeq(val, addr)        writeq(val, addr)
+#define __raw_readq            __readq
+#define __raw_writeq           __writeq
 
 /* Let people know that we have them */
 #define readq                  readq