mm: fix corruption of hibernation caused by reusing swap during image saving

Since 2.6.31, swap_map[]'s refcounting was changed to show that a used
swap entry is just for swap-cache, can be reused.  Then, while scanning
free entry in swap_map[], a swap entry may be able to be reclaimed and
reused.  It was caused by commit c9e444103b5e7a5 ("mm: reuse unused swap
entry if necessary").

But this caused deta corruption at resume. The scenario is

- Assume a clean-swap cache, but mapped.

- at hibernation_snapshot[], clean-swap-cache is saved as
  clean-swap-cache and swap_map[] is marked as SWAP_HAS_CACHE.

- then, save_image() is called.  And reuse SWAP_HAS_CACHE entry to save
  image, and break the contents.

After resume:

- the memory reclaim runs and finds clean-not-referenced-swap-cache and
  discards it because it's marked as clean.  But here, the contents on
  disk and swap-cache is inconsistent.

Hance memory is corrupted.

This patch avoids the bug by not reclaiming swap-entry during hibernation.
This is a quick fix for backporting.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Ondreg Zary <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ondreg Zary <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Andrea Gelmini <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 03aa2d55f1a2f54fc5eb17b099806edbc83a4049..f08d165871b38cd658ffc366cdf3b39290b829da 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -318,8 +318,10 @@ checks:
        if (offset > si->highest_bit)
                scan_base = offset = si->lowest_bit;
 
-       /* reuse swap entry of cache-only swap if not busy. */
-       if (vm_swap_full() && si->swap_map[offset] == SWAP_HAS_CACHE) {
+       /* reuse swap entry of cache-only swap if not hibernation. */
+       if (vm_swap_full()
+               && usage == SWAP_HAS_CACHE
+               && si->swap_map[offset] == SWAP_HAS_CACHE) {
                int swap_was_freed;
                spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
                swap_was_freed = __try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset);