sctp: Error in calculation of RTTvar
authorSchoch Christian <[email protected]>
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 05:18:29 +0000 (05:18 +0000)
committerDavid S. Miller <[email protected]>
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:13:40 +0000 (11:13 -0500)
The calculation of RTTVAR involves the subtraction of two unsigned
numbers which
may causes rollover and results in very high values of RTTVAR when RTT > SRTT.
With this patch it is possible to set RTOmin = 1 to get the minimum of RTO at
4 times the clock granularity.

Change Notes:

v2)
        *Replaced abs() by abs64() and long by __s64, changed patch
description.

Signed-off-by: Christian Schoch <[email protected]>
CC: Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]>
CC: Sridhar Samudrala <[email protected]>
CC: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
net/sctp/transport.c

index 953c21e4af977a752362187976e84b578bdb085c..206cf5238fd3ef00183f87e52734398ab475fbdb 100644 (file)
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ void sctp_transport_update_rto(struct sctp_transport *tp, __u32 rtt)
                 * 1/8, rto_alpha would be expressed as 3.
                 */
                tp->rttvar = tp->rttvar - (tp->rttvar >> net->sctp.rto_beta)
-                       + ((abs(tp->srtt - rtt)) >> net->sctp.rto_beta);
+                       + (((__u32)abs64((__s64)tp->srtt - (__s64)rtt)) >> net->sctp.rto_beta);
                tp->srtt = tp->srtt - (tp->srtt >> net->sctp.rto_alpha)
                        + (rtt >> net->sctp.rto_alpha);
        } else {