An earlier commit (
c8725f3dc0911d4354315a65150aecd8b7d0d74a: Do not call
retire_requests from wait_for_rendering) removed the use of the ring parameter
within wait_rendering__tail() but did not remove the parameter itself. As the
plan is to remove obj->ring which is where this parameter comes from, it is
simpler to just remove the parameter completely than to update it with a new
source.
For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <[email protected]>
CC: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
CC: Brad Volkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
}
static int
-i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
- struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
+i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
if (!obj->active)
return 0;
if (ret)
return ret;
- return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj, ring);
+ return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj);
}
/* A nonblocking variant of the above wait. This is a highly dangerous routine
if (ret)
return ret;
- return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj, ring);
+ return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj);
}
/**