>>>> I think this is what was intended? Note that this patch may affect
>>>> profiling.
>>> it really should be
>>>
>>> - if (likely(t1 & (sizeof(unsigned int)-1)) == 0) {
>>> + if (likely((t1 & (sizeof(unsigned int)-1)) == 0)) {
>>>
>>> randolph
Reported-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Randolph Chung <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
unaligned_copy:
/* possibly we are aligned on a word, but not on a double... */
- if (likely(t1 & (sizeof(unsigned int)-1)) == 0) {
+ if (likely((t1 & (sizeof(unsigned int)-1)) == 0)) {
t2 = src & (sizeof(unsigned int) - 1);
if (unlikely(t2 != 0)) {