[PATCH] hrtimers: fix HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_SOFTIRQ description

The description for HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_SOFTIRQ is backwards; "NO
SOFTIRQ" sounds a whole lot like it means it must not be run in a softirq.

Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

diff --git a/include/linux/hrtimer.h b/include/linux/hrtimer.h
index 3bef961b58b1e40557c806accae3c805f9398464..b9f163ddacc38065f3c22ae60a9cb25e924aa274 100644 (file)
--- a/include/linux/hrtimer.h
+++ b/include/linux/hrtimer.h
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ enum hrtimer_restart {
  *     HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE:             Callback may run in hardirq context
  *     HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_RESTART:  Callback may run in hardirq context and
  *                                     does not restart the timer
- *     HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_SOFTIRQ:  Callback must run in softirq context
+ *     HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_SOFTIRQ:  Callback must run in hardirq context
  *                                     Special mode for tick emultation
  */
 enum hrtimer_cb_mode {