There's no need to require an ifdef over the declaration
of sig_enforce as IS_ENABLED() can be used. While at it,
there's no harm in exposing this kernel parameter outside of
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG as it'd be a no-op on non module sig
kernels.
Now, technically we should in theory be able to remove
the #ifdef'ery over the declaration of the module parameter
as we are also trusting the bool_enable_only code for
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG kernels but for now remain paranoid
and keep it.
With time if no one can put a bullet through bool_enable_only
and if there are no technical requirements over not exposing
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE with the measures in place by
bool_enable_only we could remove this last ifdef.
Cc: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
#endif
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
-#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE
-static bool sig_enforce = true;
-#else
-static bool sig_enforce = false;
-
+static bool sig_enforce = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE);
+#ifndef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE
module_param(sig_enforce, bool_enable_only, 0644);
#endif /* !CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE */
-#endif /* CONFIG_MODULE_SIG */
/* Block module loading/unloading? */
int modules_disabled = 0;