memcg: do not open code accesses to res_counter members

We should use the accessor res_counter_read_u64 for that.

Although a purely cosmetic change is sometimes better delayed, to avoid
conflicting with other people's work, we are starting to have people
touching this code as well, and reproducing the open code behavior
because that's the standard =)

Time to fix it, then.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index ea1e879b2db638151ce6ba2c15a91287fea610db..a7165a60d0a7d4a688270d6cfc14f80b9af08dd5 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3763,7 +3763,7 @@ move_account:
                        goto try_to_free;
                cond_resched();
        /* "ret" should also be checked to ensure all lists are empty. */
-       } while (memcg->res.usage > 0 || ret);
+       } while (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) > 0 || ret);
 out:
        css_put(&memcg->css);
        return ret;
@@ -3778,7 +3778,7 @@ try_to_free:
        lru_add_drain_all();
        /* try to free all pages in this cgroup */
        shrink = 1;
-       while (nr_retries && memcg->res.usage > 0) {
+       while (nr_retries && res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) > 0) {
                int progress;
 
                if (signal_pending(current)) {