The sk_prot is irda's own set of protocol handlers, so irda should
statically know what that function is anyway, without using an indirect
pointer. And as it happens, we know *exactly* what that pointer is
statically: it's NULL, because irda doesn't define a disconnect
operation.
So calling that function is doubly wrong, and will just cause an oops.
Reported-by: Martin Lang <[email protected]>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>
Cc: David Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
- if (sk->sk_prot->disconnect(sk, flags))
- sock->state = SS_DISCONNECTING;
err = sock_error(sk);
if (!err)
err = -ECONNRESET;