Since commit
6539cc053869 ("mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()"),
the order to pass to mem_cgroup_oom() is calculated by passing the
number of pages to get_order() instead of the expected size in bytes.
AFAICT, it only affects the value displayed in the oom warning message.
This patch fix this.
Michal said:
: We haven't noticed that just because the OOM is enabled only for page
: faults of order-0 (single page) and get_order work just fine. Thanks for
: noticing this. If we ever start triggering OOM on different orders this
: would be broken.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
mem_cgroup_events(mem_over_limit, MEMCG_OOM, 1);
- mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(nr_pages));
+ mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
+ get_order(nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE));
nomem:
if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
return -ENOMEM;