reiserfs: don't acquire lock recursively in reiserfs_acl_chmod

reiserfs_acl_chmod() can be called by reiserfs_set_attr() and then take
the reiserfs lock a second time.  Thereafter it may call journal_begin()
that definitely requires the lock not to be nested in order to release
it before taking the journal mutex because the reiserfs lock depends on
the journal mutex already.

So, aviod nesting the lock in reiserfs_acl_chmod().

Reported-by: Pawel Zawora <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Pawel Zawora <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>		[2.6.32.x+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c b/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
index 536d697a8a283102f57053fcbb3338bd784bf559..90d2fcb67a314633a4f3855dc08e057a43390a40 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
@@ -472,7 +472,9 @@ int reiserfs_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode)
                struct reiserfs_transaction_handle th;
                size_t size = reiserfs_xattr_nblocks(inode,
                                             reiserfs_acl_size(clone->a_count));
-               reiserfs_write_lock(inode->i_sb);
+               int depth;
+
+               depth = reiserfs_write_lock_once(inode->i_sb);
                error = journal_begin(&th, inode->i_sb, size * 2);
                if (!error) {
                        int error2;
@@ -482,7 +484,7 @@ int reiserfs_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode)
                        if (error2)
                                error = error2;
                }
-               reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb);
+               reiserfs_write_unlock_once(inode->i_sb, depth);
        }
        posix_acl_release(clone);
        return error;