--- /dev/null
+Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 22:46:14 +0800
+Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Allow fall back to interpreter for programs with stack
+ size <= 512
+
+OpenWRT users reported regression on ARMv6 devices after updating to latest
+HEAD, where tcpdump filter:
+
+tcpdump "not ether host 3c37121a2b3c and not ether host 184ecbca2a3a \
+and not ether host 14130b4d3f47 and not ether host f0f61cf440b7 \
+and not ether host a84b4dedf471 and not ether host d022be17e1d7 \
+and not ether host 5c497967208b and not ether host 706655784d5b"
+
+fails with warning: "Kernel filter failed: No error information"
+when using config:
+ # CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set
+ CONFIG_BPF_JIT_DEFAULT_ON=y
+
+The issue arises because commits:
+1. "bpf: Fix array bounds error with may_goto" changed default runtime to
+ __bpf_prog_ret0_warn when jit_requested = 1
+2. "bpf: Avoid __bpf_prog_ret0_warn when jit fails" returns error when
+ jit_requested = 1 but jit fails
+
+This change restores interpreter fallback capability for BPF programs with
+stack size <= 512 bytes when jit fails.
+
+Fixes: 6ebc5030e0c5 ("bpf: Fix array bounds error with may_goto")
+---
+
+--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
++++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
+@@ -2299,8 +2299,7 @@ static unsigned int __bpf_prog_ret0_warn
+ const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+ {
+ /* If this handler ever gets executed, then BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
+- * is not working properly, or interpreter is being used when
+- * prog->jit_requested is not 0, so warn about it!
++ * is not working properly, so warn about it!
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return 0;
+@@ -2385,8 +2384,9 @@ out:
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+-static void bpf_prog_select_func(struct bpf_prog *fp)
++static bool bpf_prog_select_interpreter(struct bpf_prog *fp)
+ {
++ bool select_interpreter = false;
+ #ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
+ u32 stack_depth = max_t(u32, fp->aux->stack_depth, 1);
+ u32 idx = (round_up(stack_depth, 32) / 32) - 1;
+@@ -2395,15 +2395,16 @@ static void bpf_prog_select_func(struct
+ * But for non-JITed programs, we don't need bpf_func, so no bounds
+ * check needed.
+ */
+- if (!fp->jit_requested &&
+- !WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(interpreters))) {
++ if (idx < ARRAY_SIZE(interpreters)) {
+ fp->bpf_func = interpreters[idx];
++ select_interpreter = true;
+ } else {
+ fp->bpf_func = __bpf_prog_ret0_warn;
+ }
+ #else
+ fp->bpf_func = __bpf_prog_ret0_warn;
+ #endif
++ return select_interpreter;
+ }
+
+ /**
+@@ -2422,7 +2423,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime
+ /* In case of BPF to BPF calls, verifier did all the prep
+ * work with regards to JITing, etc.
+ */
+- bool jit_needed = fp->jit_requested;
++ bool jit_needed = false;
+
+ if (fp->bpf_func)
+ goto finalize;
+@@ -2431,7 +2432,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime
+ bpf_prog_has_kfunc_call(fp))
+ jit_needed = true;
+
+- bpf_prog_select_func(fp);
++ if (!bpf_prog_select_interpreter(fp))
++ jit_needed = true;
+
+ /* eBPF JITs can rewrite the program in case constant
+ * blinding is active. However, in case of error during