mm: memcontrol: use special workqueue for creating per-memcg caches
authorVladimir Davydov <[email protected]>
Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:41:29 +0000 (16:41 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Tue, 13 Dec 2016 02:55:06 +0000 (18:55 -0800)
Creating a lot of cgroups at the same time might stall all worker
threads with kmem cache creation works, because kmem cache creation is
done with the slab_mutex held.  The problem was amplified by commits
801faf0db894 ("mm/slab: lockless decision to grow cache") in case of
SLAB and 81ae6d03952c ("mm/slub.c: replace kick_all_cpus_sync() with
synchronize_sched() in kmem_cache_shrink()") in case of SLUB, which
increased the maximal time the slab_mutex can be held.

To prevent that from happening, let's use a special ordered single
threaded workqueue for kmem cache creation.  This shouldn't introduce
any functional changes regarding how kmem caches are created, as the
work function holds the global slab_mutex during its whole runtime
anyway, making it impossible to run more than one work at a time.  By
using a single threaded workqueue, we just avoid creating a thread per
each work.  Ordering is required to avoid a situation when a cgroup's
work is put off indefinitely because there are other cgroups to serve,
in other words to guarantee fairness.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172981
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161004131417.GC1862@esperanza
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Doug Smythies <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
mm/memcontrol.c

index 0f870ba43942e74d1d535a13437e446da5863b1a..91dfc7c5ce8f6229003009b2e75d3056acc5912e 100644 (file)
@@ -2154,6 +2154,8 @@ struct memcg_kmem_cache_create_work {
        struct work_struct work;
 };
 
+static struct workqueue_struct *memcg_kmem_cache_create_wq;
+
 static void memcg_kmem_cache_create_func(struct work_struct *w)
 {
        struct memcg_kmem_cache_create_work *cw =
@@ -2185,7 +2187,7 @@ static void __memcg_schedule_kmem_cache_create(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
        cw->cachep = cachep;
        INIT_WORK(&cw->work, memcg_kmem_cache_create_func);
 
-       schedule_work(&cw->work);
+       queue_work(memcg_kmem_cache_create_wq, &cw->work);
 }
 
 static void memcg_schedule_kmem_cache_create(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
@@ -5783,6 +5785,17 @@ static int __init mem_cgroup_init(void)
 {
        int cpu, node;
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_SLOB
+       /*
+        * Kmem cache creation is mostly done with the slab_mutex held,
+        * so use a special workqueue to avoid stalling all worker
+        * threads in case lots of cgroups are created simultaneously.
+        */
+       memcg_kmem_cache_create_wq =
+               alloc_ordered_workqueue("memcg_kmem_cache_create", 0);
+       BUG_ON(!memcg_kmem_cache_create_wq);
+#endif
+
        hotcpu_notifier(memcg_cpu_hotplug_callback, 0);
 
        for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)