In the current code "ent_per_page" could be more than "conn_num" making
"conn_num" negative after the subtraction. In the next iteration
through the loop then the negative is treated as a very high positive
meaning we don't put a limit on "ent_num". It could lead to memory
corruption.
Fixes: dbb799c39717 ('qed: Initialize hardware for new protocols')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yuval Mintz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
val = 0;
entries[j].next = cpu_to_be64(val);
- conn_num -= ent_per_page;
+ conn_num -= ent_num;
}
return 0;